Introduction to the water fueled car

Energy from water

Authors

Besides from the popular variate of hydrogen on demand fuel saving technologies scientists and inventors have also discovered various different technologies to run cars on water alone. If you want to save fuel you should obtain this pdf document from the panacea university and build a smack booster by it's instructions. The documentation below aims to show the validity of 100% water powered vehicles. Historically quite a few water powered autos have been build but the technology was either lost or never made public. The petrochemical industry is a powerful multi billion Euro enterprise. Governments depend on fuel taxes. Military power relies on technological advantage. The news media depend on advertisement revenue and the academic establishment loves clinging on to dogma.

Scientists

1926, Irving Langmuir invented the Atomic Hydrogen torch
1968, Daniel Dingle (NASA scientist) converted his first car to run on water.
1971, Herman P. Anderson (NASA scientist) converted a Ford LTD to run on water.
1974, Dr. Yull Brown (Heavy water physicist) converted various vehicles to run on water.
1970, Dr. Andrija Puharich (MD) Converted his motor home to run on water.
2007, Prof. Philipp M. Kanarev constructed a plasma electrolytic device bywhich 1000% of additional energy is obtained.

Inventors

1935, Charles and Dad Garrett's car had been in operation continuously for several days.
1942, Francisco Pacheco invented a device that turns sea water into combustible hydrogen.
1960, Edward Estevel developed a 'water auto system'.
1974, Stephen Horvath discovered a safe thermonuclear reaction that produces a mixture of highly ionized hydrogen and oxygen gases by combining electrolysis and radiolysis.
1980, Stanley Allan Meyer  converted and drove a VW buggy on water for four years.
1983, Carl Cella converted a 1979 Cadilac Coupe de Ville to run on water.
2002, Dennis Klein converted his car to run on water.
2005, Steve Ryan made a stock 350cc motorbike run on water.
2008, Genepax developed a battery charger and fitted it onto a stock electric car


Researchers

1874, John Ernst Worrell Keely discovered a way to disassociate water using acoustics.
1965, Rodger Billings built the a hydrogen powered car as a high school science project.
1966, Dr. William A. Rhodes was the first to obtain a US patent using a common delivery duct for both gases.
1970, Sam Leach developed a hydrogen extraction process.
1982, Tay-Hee Hau was granted one of the earlier patents regarding the use of high voltage to decompose water
1989, Dr. Stanley Pons and Dr. Martin Fleishmann successfully produced room temperature fusion.
1990, Dr. Yoshiro Nakamats build his Nostradamvs Engine II, and he developed his ENEREX system capible of powering a car.
19??, Paul Pantone developed the GEET engine producing plasma from exhaust heat.
1999 Dr. Leslie Bromberg, Dr. Alex Rabinovich and Dr. Daniel Cohn developed the Plasmatron fuel converter to transform gasoline or other hydrocarbons into hydrogen rich gas.
2003, Xogen Technologies developed a waste-water treatment system that produces power as a byproduct.


Popular counter reasoning

  1. "car companies would have incorporated such an easy solution"
    1. Car companies have quite consistently produced less efficient cars. Nixon made fuel efficiency the law, later this law was abolished and today we have less efficient cars than when Nixon moved into office. In1973 Shell Oil converted this "of the shelve" Opel and it did 160 km per liter or 376 miles per Gallon. Thankfully, history is well documented, we don't have to guess what happened.
  2. "It violates the laws of thermodynamics."
    1. The technology is made up out of separate parts, the sum of the parts makes the whole. If this indeed invalidates the laws of thermodynamics then so be it, hundreds of empirical observations have shown the laws to be wrong in the micro world. Electron orbit doesn't decay. Thus, from a scientific point of view this technology fits under the category nuclear reactions.
  3. "Nuclear energy is not safe"
    1.  Yull Brown demonstrated it to be more than safe.

Oxygen depletion

We had 38% oxygen in the atmosphere in 1940. Today in 2008 the oxygen content of air in Tokyo can be as low as 6%, we have over 400 dead zones in the ocean and millions of people die per year from causes related to hypoxia, a pathological condition in which the body is deprived of oxygen. We are not just burning a hydrogen-carbon based substance, we are burning up the atmosphere along with it. Coal and petroleum are not a free rides but can and will eventually kill everyone. We should all agree we need air to breath. Burning hydro-carbons is not a perpetual motion device or a free lunch.

Scientific dishonesty

Money talks, scientists have prostituted themselves to debunk aviation, nuclear reactions, global warming, anti-gravity, artificial intelligence, bio plasma, Orgone energy, telekinesis, telepathy, reincarnation, bio plastics, industrial hemp, extra terrestrial life and of course cold fusion.

It may be hard for you to understand the fruits of research can not be judged without doing the actual research however the lack of vision is apparent to a child where 5 years into commercial aviation the establishment was finally prepared to implement the real world into the books. At no stage did mainstream science so much as entertain the thought. For 5 years the aerocrafts flew over the university while professors continued to debunk the "hoax". It doesn't take much imagination to see what happened to the few noble scientists who long before had produced workable theories towards such devices. Laughing people off the stage is never a constructive scientific endeavor. It equates with witch burning and decapitating heretics. In the short run one  may earn Enronian millions in the long run it makes it impossible for anyone to see the truth.

The septics

The truth is not anyone's opinion. The data requires hard work, in depth investigation and a review with honesty rather than preconceived arguments. The knife cuts at both ends, we have psychiatrists to diagnose insanity, such diagnosis from a physicist would be far outside his area of expertise. It would be an act of quackery in it self. We have wind tunnels because the math still doesn't fit the real world. Fission, superconductivity, crystal radio, optical lasers, microwave masers, X-rays and radio -research all suffered needless delay by ignorant skeptics. Why not be skeptical about oil reserves? Why not be skeptical about Exxon debunking alternative energy? Are you sure your septi think tank is not funded by big business?

The energy crisis

Even to a mind with very limited imagination it cant escape the energy crisis fills big pockets with big money. From this single fact alone we can derive why mankind has no need for a Large hadron collider.(sorry Brian) Furthermore we conclude that while the global economy plunges into depression public funding is consumed by giant toys having zero potential for return on investment. If one argues the data is scientifically interesting we may then conclude scientific interests to be unrelated to real world progress. Compared to mind controll experiments on childrennuclear weapons, weaponizing of space or any other cryptonym of slavery the water fueled car is more than worthy of in-depth investigation, funding and implementation.

<<< water fueled car

Comments

Is It Really???

This is the moment of awe really.. Are you really saying it about have water fueled cars? Cool, this is what is known as 21st century where anything is possible.. Great, this is really amazing..!!
http://www.toplinemotorcycles.net

Christina Lawrence - Apr 7, 2011

Thushara Priyamal Edirisinghe

why have we not heard of him or seen him since November 2008???

vijaya fernando - Jan 10, 2010