The water fueled car
IntroductionStan Meyer discovered a long list of ways to make hydrogen gas from tap water without electrolyte without significant energy consumption. Meyer converted and drove a VW buggy on the gas for four years. The hardware involved has been experimentally examined by Dr. Eugene Antonov, Dr. Vladimir Dresyiannikov, Dr. Tibor Nagypal, Roy Azevedo, Peter Graneau, Charles Millet, Neal Graneau, Gary Johnson, Rea O’Neill, Prof. Mike Laughton, Admiral Sir Anthony Griffin, Dr Keith Hindley, US military, US Patent Office experts and the Pantent Office seconded experts by whom the claims have been established. The basic Water Fuel Cell (WFC) was subjected to three years of testing. This raises the granted patents to the level of independent, critical, scientific and engineering confirmation that the devices actually perform as claimed.
Hydrogen the ideal fuel for the futureIn one of Stan Meyers presentations he states the following:
1 - to produce the hydrogen economically from water
2 - adjust the rate of combustion
3 - being able to burn the hydrogen gas co-equal to fossil fuels.
4 - being able to transport it without spark ignition.
In order to salve the puzzle as a scientist you have to ask the right question.
We need a way to switch off the bonds and not process the water molecule in any way. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. So when the unlike atoms of the hydrogen atoms covalently link up to the oxygen. Normally the oxygen atom has 8 protons and 8 electrons. But when the oxygen atom accepts the negatively charged electron from the hydrogen atom there is an electrical imbalance. The oxygen atom still has 8 protons but has 10 electrons, it shares 2 electrons with the hydrogen. The first orbit can have 2 electrons, the next orbit can have up to 8. The oxygen is now in a balanced state while having 10 electrons. This gives the hydrogen atom a positive electrical charge. this is how a microwave oven can heat up water, it swings the molecule. The microwave oven creates a positive and a negative potential and oscillates the molecule. So the molecule has opposite electrical charge Q and Q prime.
There is no electromagnetic field between the oxygen and the hydrogen atom. All we have to do is reverse the electrolysis process. We don't pump amps into the water. All that is needed is an electrically polarized field. It is known in Physics that Voltage does absolutely does work!
Under coulombs law, and Newton's second law it should attract the opposite charge. All one needs to do is setup opposite electrical charges and the positive field will be attracting the negative charge, the negative field is repelling the negative charge. The positive field is repelling the positive charge and the positive field is attracting the negative charge.
Faraday didn't discover it
1 - The knowledge of water will come out of time of great trouble.
2 - Faraday didn't discover this process is because he used a relatively crude setup, he needed modern day inventions to be able to do it.
2.1 - Faraday didn't have stainless steel (3 or 4) which is chemically inert to the process, it does not chemically react to the hydrogen oxygen molecules.
2.2 - He didn't have the prior knowledge that water molecule takes on opposite electrical charges.
2.3 - He didn't have modern electronic circuit design to restrict amps and let voltage take over in a dead short condition. There was no way to restrict amps in a dead short condition. The amperage continued to flow.
All he had to do was restrict the amps. We overcome the electrical attraction force of the water molecule and cause it to expand, we change the time share rate of the electron. So now we are switching off the bonds of ordinary natural water without processing any other materials and doing it cheaply. On the covalent switch off we are deflecting the negatively charged electrons to the positive voltage field.
Here we are translating electrical stress to the particles inside the nucleus. The nucleus is spinning like a gyroscopic, the stress causes it to slow down. When a electrically charged particle moves trough an electrostatic field its by product is electrical energy. The strength of the electrical field is directly related to the speed of the electron. If we slow down the speed we can weaken the electromagnetic fields of the atoms.
There are 4 forces that affect the atom.
1 - electrical force
2 - electromagnetic force
3 - electrostatic force
4 - weak and strong nuclear force.
Voltage affects the other 3. If we continuate the electrical field of the atom we continuate all the other fields of the atom. We can do this without consuming a great deal of power. Using a voltage intensify circuit coil and a resonant cavity. Water being a dielectric liquid has 8 electrons in it's L orbit, it wont exchange more. It imposes the movement of electrons 17.54 times greater than air.
We make a water capacitor and set it up in series between 2 resonant coils making a resonant charging choke. We set up a pulse and amplify for example 12 volt pulses up to 20 000 volt.
As we pulse the coil we create a magnetic field in the coil which supposes the movement of the electron. Because of inductive capacitance of the coil we now allow voltage to be applied to the resonant cavity and restrict amperage flow by 90 degrees. We tune the pulse frequency into the dielectric frequency of water amperage flows go down to a minimum and Voltage will increase to infinity if the electrical components will allow it to occur.
When we move a magnetic field though a coil of wire it dislodges the electron the furthest away. That electron has an electromagnetic field and we are producing electricity!
To restrict the amperage we need a voltage intensifying circuit. This is basically a special transformer having a primary and a secondary coil. The core is made out of stainless steel 403 fr, because of it's inductance capacitance it allows us to restrict the amps and operate in a dead short position. The higher the voltage the more hydrogen is produced.
Up to here we are using voltage and stainless steel. Stanley Meyer then progressed to add laser energy to take his discovery to a hydrogen fracturing technology. We raise the voltage to a stage where we pluck off the electrons. When we pluck the electrons off the oxygen atoms, we have negative charged particles floating around in the water. Here we go to a stage of mega hydrogen production. We cant go into atomic resonance by electricity alone.
Electrolysis is a self destructing reaction that lasts about 5 to 10 min. When we continue to increase the voltage we hit resonant action. We run hydrogen production for 5 seconds, we shut it off and we continue to produce hydrogen for another 94 seconds. We thus produce 19 times as much hydrogen gas at the output as on the input side of the system.
Stan states we have to maintain the industrial base because we don't have the means to replace it. We have to modify the system to be fit to be retrofitted onto existing technology. Hydrogen burns around 325 cm per second which is much to fast. Water is like a sponge it will absorb gasses. It will absorb 17-19% of ambient air. The bulk of which is made up out of non combustible gasses. This can be used to maintain a burn rate of 75 cm per second thus allow us to adjust the burn rate of the hydrogen gas. The gas can now be modulated to match other combustible gasses or liquids all the way down to burning paper. The gas can even be adjusted to replace natural gas and use it for cooking.
Without using a spark back device it wont be a safe reaction. However, when the gases come of the reaction the non combustible gasses prevent the hydrogen atoms from coming together like in a atomic hydrogen torch.
And it allows for a totally cool reaction.
We need to prevent melting the engine. To lower the temperature from 5000 degrees down to 200 or 300 degrees we take the non combustible exhaust gases from the flame and recycle them back to the flame and back to the generator.
The Water fuel cell
+ Wireless world
1993, a lecture was given at a UK symposium on the Impact of New Technology on the Marine Industries by Admiral Sir Anthony Griffin Griffin's most elaborate resume includes but is by no means limited to: chairman British Ship Builders, president of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, chairman of governors of Wellington College. His perseverance is referred to as legendary as was his interest in technological developments.
Meyer earned US patents granted under Section 101. As, 1) his water
fuel cell did not follow the established scientific understanding of
electrolysis and 2) patents for basic electrolysis apparatus can not be
granted Meyer was granted his patents only after successful
demonstration of the inventions to a patent review board.
Meyer uses an external inductance which appears to resonate with the capacitance of the cell (pure water apparently possesses a dielectric constant of about 5) to produce a parallel resonant circuit. This is excited by a high power pulse generator which, together with the cell capacitance and a rectifier diode, forms a charge pump circuit. High frequency pulses build a rising staircase DC potential across the electrodes of the cell until a point is reached where the water breaks down and a momentary high current flows. A current measuring circuit in the supply detects this breakdown and removes the pulse drive for a few cycles allowing the water to "recover".
Research chemist Keith Hindley offers this description of a Meyer cell demonstration: "After a day of presentations, the Griffin committee witnessed a number of important demonstration of the WFC" (water fuel cell as named by the inventor).
A witness team of independent UK scientific observers testified that US inventor Stanley Meyer successfully decomposed ordinary tap water into constituent elements through a combination of high, pulsed voltage using an average current measured only in milliamps. Reported gas evolution was enough to sustain a hydrogen /oxygen flame which instantly melted steel.
In contrast with normal high current electrolysis, the witnesses report the lack of any heating within the cell. Meyer declines to release details which would allow scientists to duplicate and evaluate his "water fuel cell". However, he has supplied enough detail to the US Patent Office to persuade them that he can substantiate his 'power-from-water' claims.
One demonstration cell was fitted with two parallel plate "excitors". Using tap water to fill the cell, the plates generated gas at very low current levels --- no greater than a tenth of an amp on the ammeter, and claimed to be milliamps by Meyer --- and this gas production increased steadily as the plates were moved closer together and decreased as they were separated. The DC voltage appeared to be pulsed at tens of thousands of volts.
A second cell carried nine stainless steel double tube cell units and generated much more gas. A sequence of photographs was taken showing gas production at milliamp levels. When the voltage was turned up to its peak value, the gas then poured off at a very impressive level.
"We did notice that the water at the top of the cell slowly became discolored with a pale cream and dark brown precipitate, almost certainly the effects of the chlorine in the heavily chlorinated tap water on the stainless steel tubes used as "excitors".
He was demonstrating hydrogen gas production at milliamp and kilo volt levels.
"The most remarkable observation is that the WFC and all its metal pipework remained quite cold to the touch, even after more than twenty minutes of operation. The splitting mechanism clearly evolves little heat in sharp contrast to electrolysis where the electrolyte warms up quickly."
"The results appear to suggest efficient and controllable gas production that responds rapidly to demand and yet is safe in operation. We clearly saw how increasing and decreasing the voltage is used to control gas production. We saw how gas generation ceased and then began again instantly as the voltage driving circuit was switched off and then on again."
"After hours of discussion between ourselves, we concluded that Stan Meyer did appear to have discovered an entirely new method for splitting water which showed few of the characteristics of classical electrolysis. Confirmation that his devices actually do work come from his collection of granted US patents on various parts of the WFC system. Since they were granted under Section 101 by the US Patent Office, the hardware involved in the patents has been examined experimentally by US Patent Office experts and their seconded experts and all the claims have been established."
"The basic WFC was subjected to three years of testing. This raises the granted patents to the level of independent, critical, scientific and engineering confirmation that the devices actually perform as claimed."
The practical demonstration of the Meyer cell appears substantially more convincing than the para-scientific jargon which has been used to explain it. The inventor himself talks about a distortion and polarization of the water molecule resulting in the H:OH bonding tearing itself apart under the electrostatic potential gradient, of a resonance within the molecule which amplifies the effect.
Apart from the copious hydrogen/oxygen gas evolution and the minimal temperature rise within the cell, witnesses also report that water within the cell disappears rapidly, presumably into its component parts and as an aerosol from the myriad of tiny bubbles breaking the surface of the cell.
Meyer claims to have run a converted VW on hydrogen/oxygen mixture for the last four years using a chain of six cylindrical cells. He also claims that photon stimulation of the reactor space by optical fibre piped laser light increases gas production.
The inventor is a protegee' of the Advanced Energy Institute.
PROCESSES OP PRODUCING -FUEL GASES BY REFORMING LIQUID Bertrand J. Mayland
3468641 - Gross
3471274 - Quigley
3572297 - Murray
3792688 - Grainger
3799124 - Swain
3897757 - Abello
3963000 - Kosaka
3995421 - Kuroiwa
3995600 - DeLuca
4016837 - Wentworth, Jr.
4079703 - Yamane
4086878 - Eisele
4112875 - Fletcher
4112889 - Harpman
4141326 - Wolber
4181100 - Yamane
4193755 - Guarnaschelli
4274383 - Adams
4367700 - Pace
4368712 - Jackson
4370970 - Kunz
4385615 - Keane
4389981 - Meyer
4458634 - Carr
4508064 - Watanabe
4622924 - Lewis
4628871 - Glass
4665879 - Earl
4881507 - San Filipo
4953514 - Beicht
4955351 - Lewis
5085176 - Brinkley, III
5088452 - Iwaki
5092281 - Iwaki
5115768 - Peschka
5119768 - Russell
5140966 - Wong
5178118 - Nakamats
5183011 - Fujii
5226400 - Birch
5282497 - Allison
5293857 - Meyer
5359968 - Shiraishi
5363828 - Yamashita
5398663 - Kulasinghe
5438961 - Peschka
5462021 - Minami
5548952 - Stock
5603290 - Swain
5743080 - Ginter
5752157 - Yamashita
5765538 - Krimmer
5782225 - Caggiano
5816223 - Jamrog
5832718 - Suttrop
5890472 - Saito
5899188 - Firey
5934260 - Gadkaree
5944003 - Osanai
5946916 - Ven
5979418 - Saruwatari
6003312 - Schlichtig
6015133 - DeLand
6044831 - Takagi
6053153 - Moser
6067966 - Saito
6076355 - Ven
6095121 - Osanai
6116221 - Matsumoto
6119651 - Anderson
6138644 - Saruwatari
6138655 - Kerns
6155239 - Dykstra
6681749 - Bushnell
6880541 - Hanazaki et al.
6907866 - Bushnell et al.
6966308 - Bushnell et al.
7028675 - Bushnell et al.
Others citing Recichelm
Combustion system and method
Process and apparatus for stoichiometric combustion of fuel oil
Burner-boiler combination and an improved burner construction therefor
Others citing La Haye
APPARATUS FOR, BURNING FLUID FUEL - ARTHUR B. PARKER, JOHN A. MAcCORMACK AND REGINALD J. S. PIGOTT
Others citing Brodlin
Fuel vaporizer and burner unit for space heater
Infrared ray generator